Monday, December 30, 2013

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Monday, November 25, 2013

 

Monday, November 11, 2013

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Children with autism learn to surf on Lake Ontario


Children with autism learn to surf on Lake Ontario

California couple offers free surf program at Toronto beach

 Posted: Aug 24, 2013 6:10 PM ET

Last Updated: Aug 24, 2013 6:28 PM ET
About 300 children with autism are riding the waves of Lake Ontario this weekend in a free learn-to-surf program being offered by a California couple.

Izzy and Daniel Paskowitz started the Surfers Healing program after their son was diagnosed with autism at age three.

"We were young and desperate when Isaiah was diagnosed and we pretty much gave our life savings to alternative therapies," said Izzy.
'It's good for his mind and body and it's something we're going to take up more seriously.'—Calvin Berry, father
Nearly 3,000 children across North America participate in the program every year, and it's being held in Toronto for the second time.

Calvin Berry watched from the shore at Cherry Beach on Saturday as his eight-year-old son C.J. stood up on the board as it moved across the water.

"It soothes him," Berry said. "It's good for his mind and body and it's something we're going to take up more seriously."

The program is sponsored by private donors and attracted some well-known athletes who volunteered their time to help teach the children.

Garrett McNamara holds a place in the record books for surfing a 30-metre wave off the coast of Portugal, but says this camp gives him so much more.

"This kind of recharges me," he said. "Working with the children and their families and sharing our sport."

The CBC's Natalie Kalata said experts aren't exactly sure why surfing is therapeutic for autistic children, but parents told her it's making a real difference.

Janice Yuen, a mother whose child is participating in the camp, said it comes down to a difference in body awareness.

"In the water, your body is actually pushing against the water, they feel more relaxed," she said.

"They feel more calm and they have more body awareness for sensory issues."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2013/08/24/toronto-surfing-autistic-children-beach.html

Calvin Barry on Sports Radio


Friday, August 9, 2013

Monday, July 15, 2013

Friday, June 21, 2013

Calvin Barry Defence Lawyer

Spice man trial: Assault victim asked why he didn’t seek help at scene

Manuel Belo, the victim in the spice man trial, testified Thursday that he didn’t deserve to be attacked by Toronto restaurateur Naveen Polapady.

By: News reporter, Published on Thu Jun 20 2013          
Explore This Story
   
If you had just been attacked, your eyes stinging from a spicy substance being thrown in your face, your head split open and bleeding, what would you do after breaking free of your assailant?
 
Would you ride your bicycle home to wash out your eyes? Or try to find someone to help?
 
Those were questions posed to Manuel Belo, the victim in what’s been dubbed the “spice man trial”, after he resumed his testimony Thursday. In August 2011, restaurateur Naveen Polapady allegedly threw a “chicken masala” mixture at Belo and struck him numerous times with a broomstick after mistaking him for another man, who Polapady caught on camera breaking into his cube van.
 
After the incident, Belo got on his bicycle and rode roughly four blocks from Polapady’s Bloor St. property, which doubles as his restaurant and his house, to his own Palmerston Ave. home, shared with his mother and daughter. Belo said he kept one eye open at a time as he travelled.
 
Defence lawyer Calvin Barry asked why he didn’t try to get help before going home.
“I had to get whatever it was that was stinging my face off,” Belo said.
 
Barry suggested Belo didn’t stick around or stop for help because he was attempting to break into Polapady’s van that day, and didn’t want to be arrested. Belo categorically denied that statement.
 
Polapady is facing charges of assault causing bodily harm and assault with a weapon related to the scuffle.
 
Belo maintained that he didn’t know he was on Polapady’s property when he walked toward the door to scout for empty bottles to cash in, what used to be a regular pastime for him. But even then, the 51-year-old bricklayer said he didn’t deserve to be attacked over a case of mistaken identity.
 
Polapady has said he mistook Belo for a man he caught on video breaking into his car four days before the altercation, on Aug. 17, 2011.
  
The defence’s case, however, rests on the idea that it doesn’t matter if Polapady had the wrong guy — Belo was treading where he didn't belong.
 
“Whether or not (Belo) thought of all the times he’d been on (Polapady’s) property, that one time he got it wrong, really is a red herring,” Barry said.
 
Belo was arrested after the tussle, but was never charged with a crime.
 
Police later arrested another man, Justin Mitchell, for stealing from Polapady’s van. He pleaded guilty to theft under $5,000 last April.
 
During his cross-examination, Barry often referred back to statements Belo made either to the police the day of his arrest, or during an April court appearance, and pointed out what he believed to be contradictions in Belo’s testimony.
 
At one point, Crown attorney John Flaherty objected to Barry’s method of questioning, saying that the defence lawyer was “trying to take advantage of (Belo’s) lack of recollection.”
 
Justice Peter Harris, said he would allow the questioning, noting that Belo was perhaps more certain about some details than he should be.
 
The line of inquiry “goes to the question of how reliable he is,” Harris said.
 

Monday, April 22, 2013

Calvin Barry, Toronto Lawyer

Spice victim bore ‘startling resemblance’ to car thief, defence lawyer argues

Megan O'Toole | 13/04/19 | Last Updated: 13/04/19 9:30 PM ET
More from Megan O'Toole | @megan_otoole
 
Naveen Polapady, owner of Maroli Indian Kerala Cuisine on Bloor Street West in Toronto, poses for a photograph at his second restaurant in Brampton, On., on Wednesday, April 25, 2012.
Naveen Polapady, owner of Maroli Indian Kerala Cuisine on Bloor Street West in Toronto, poses for a photograph at his second restaurant in Brampton, On., on Wednesday, April 25, 2012.
 
A year after the Prime Minister’s Office called to express support for Toronto restaurateur Naveen Polapady, the court on Friday heard a very different account of the vigilante Spiceman, whose case spurred a national debate on the rights of citizens to defend their property.

For the first time publicly, Manuel Belo — the 51-year-old who infamously received a faceful of masala spices when Mr. Polapady mistook him for a car thief — told his side of the story, describing how he began the morning of Aug. 21, 2011, on his bicycle, scavenging for bottles and cans to supplement his modest bricklayer’s income. He had just finished scanning the parking lot behind Maroli restaurant on Bloor Street, when out of nowhere he felt a substance “like spaghetti sauce watered down” thrown into his face.

“My vision was impaired. My breathing was impaired,” said Mr. Belo, a reformed crack addict who was once jailed for stealing copper wire and subsequently began volunteering at a local food bank.

“It was thrown directly over my face, all over my head… It went in my eyes, it went in my mouth [and] I couldn’t see anything at all,” Mr. Belo told Mr. Polapady’s assault trial. “My eyes were stinging.”

It became difficult to breathe, he added, as each gulp of air felt “like swallowing hot coals.” His first reaction was shock.

“I was just surprised,” he testified. “I didn’t realize what was going on.”

The precursor to the spice-hurling incident came four days earlier, when convicted thief Jason Mitchell broke into Mr. Polapady’s car to steal several items, including a GPS device and a laptop.
The defence contends Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Belo bore a “startling resemblance” to each other, almost like twins. Summoned to the stand Friday, Toronto Police Const. Shahrukh Mirza agreed they had “certain features” in common; both were white, had receding hairlines and were wearing backpacks and riding bicycles.

So when he found Mr. Belo lurking in the Maroli parking lot on Aug. 21, 2011, Mr. Polapady assumed he had caught the thief red-handed, the court heard. Surveillance footage shows the pair grappling as Mr. Polapady wields a broomstick.

Mr. Belo says he felt his body “being whacked” by that stick moments after the sauce-like spice mixture hit his face.

Whack. ‘Where’s my GPS?’ Whack. ‘Where’s my GPS?’

“I felt the stick break once [on my arm] and then I felt it break again on the other arm,” Mr. Belo testified, noting he pleaded with his attacker to stop, but all the other man said in response was: “Where’s my GPS?”

The stick connected with his legs and arms, Mr. Belo said, and opened a gash in his head that required six stitches.

“I tried to punch him but I couldn’t see where he was too well,” Mr. Belo said, adding he screamed at Mr. Polapady to leave him alone. “[I told him], ‘I’m just collecting empties. I don’t have the GPS. But all I kept getting was: Whack. ‘Where’s my GPS?’ Whack. ‘Where’s my GPS?’”

The two scuffled for a brief period before breaking apart and leaving the area separately, Mr. Belo on his bicycle and Mr. Polapady in his van. As he cycled away, Mr. Belo says he came across a garden hose and used it to wash the red spice mixture from his hair, ears and face.

During cross-examination, defence lawyer Calvin Barry suggested that even though Mr. Belo was not the GPS thief from days earlier, he had indeed attempted to open the back door of Mr. Polapady’s van on Aug. 21, 2011, and was “caught in the act.”

“You lunged at [Mr. Polapady]. To defend himself, he shot that chili pepper in your face,” Mr. Barry asserted.

“No,” Mr. Belo maintained.

“You lunged at him and with your other hand you grabbed at his throat… It’s a full-blown fight,” Mr. Barry said.

Mr. Belo disagreed, maintaining he had only stopped by the Maroli lot to check for bottles and cans. The ensuing struggle prevented him from attending his brick-laying job for a few days, he testified, primarily because of the swelling to his legs.

Ever since that fateful day, Mr. Belo says he has refrained from collecting any stray bottles or cans. Sometimes he comes across empties in the park, but he lets them lie.

“With my luck,” he told the court, “if I bent down to pick it up, squirrels would think I’m trying to steal their chestnuts.”

The trial resumes in June.
 
 

Calvin Barry Defends Spice Man


Spice man trial: ‘It felt like I was swallowing hot coals’


Manuel Belo, the man allegedly hit in the face with spices by a Toronto restaurateur, took the stand Friday in the continuing “spice man” trial.

Restaurateur  Naveen Polapady  is accompanied by wife Snigdha as he arrives for a court hearing in Feburary. Polapady is facing assault charges related to a violent tussle outside his restaurant in 2011.Restaurateur Naveen Polapady is accompanied by wife Snigdha as he arrives for a court hearing in Feburary. Polapady is facing assault charges related to a violent tussle outside his restaurant in 2011.


Manuel Belo hopped off his bike behind an Indian restaurant on Bloor St. W. early on a Sunday morning in 2011.

The 50-year-old was looking for empty bottles or cans in the recycling bins, as he does a few times a month in the alley that runs parallel to Bloor.

He thought he saw two empty liquor bottles — but was mistaken. He was getting on his bike to leave, when someone came up behind him and threw a substance like “watered-down spaghetti sauce” in his face.

“I couldn’t see anything at all, my eyes were stinging,” he told the court Friday afternoon as the so-called “spice man trial” continued. “It felt like I was swallowing hot coals.”

He couldn’t see who it was: “my sight was impaired, my breathing was impaired.”

“Stop. I’m just collecting empties,” he told the court he yelled. But then he felt a stick hit him, and a man’s voice yell repeatedly “where is my GPS?”

He felt the stick crack on his forearms, he testified. The man also hit him directly on his baseball-hat covered head, causing him to need stitches, Belo said.

The violent altercation, where Belo said he attempted to punch restaurateur Naveen Polapady though he was unable to see clearly, was caught on surveillance cameras operated by Polapady.

Polapady is facing assault charges related to the violent tussle that began with throwing what he calls “chicken masala” at Belo’s face.

Polapady has said he mistook Belo for a man he caught on video breaking into his car on Aug. 17, 2011. That man — Justin Mitchell, an acquaintance of Belo’s — was later arrested and pleaded guilty to theft under $5,000 last April.

However, Polapady’s lawyer Calvin Barry contends that Belo was trying to break into Polapady’s van that Sunday morning, and had the day before attempted to open the back door to the restaurant. Polapady lives above the restaurant with his family. Belo denies he made any attempts to break into Polapady’s property.

Belo — accompanied to court Friday by his tearful mother and brother — is a bricklayer by trade who has lived most of his life on Palmerston Blvd., a five-minute bike ride away from Polapady’s restaurant. He has been convicted on one charge of break-and-enter and two charges of attempted break-and-enter in 2006.

At the time he was addicted to crack and abusing alcohol, he told the court. However, the nine days he spent in jail and subsequent community service helped get him clean, he said.

Since Aug. 21, 2011, Belo no longer collects empty bottles and cans even from the park, he told the court. “Knowing my luck the squirrels would say I was trying to steal their chestnuts and I’d end up with rabies shots instead of stitches.”

The trial resumes in June.

The “spice man” case has grabbed attention for is similarities to the “Lucky Moose” case, in which Toronto store owner David Chen was arrested after catching and tying up a shoplifter.

Chen became the face of the “citizen’s arrest” legislation passed last June that empowers ordinary people to make arrests within a reasonable time of the crime being committed, when there’s no option to have police do so. It also permits people to take reasonable actions — as determined by a judge — to defend their homes and families.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Martin Montes, Associate to Calvin Barry

London man killed wife, made up story about robbers: Crown

Defense attorneys for Daniel Jimenez-Acosta, Setu Purohit and Martin Montes (l-r) leave court in London Thursday Apr 4, 2013.

London man killed wife, made up story about robbers: Crown
 
Credits: MIKE HENSEN/QMI AGENCY
 
KELLY PEDRO | QMI AGENCY

LONDON, Ont. - Daniel Jimenez-Acosta, 45, testified he thought it was a "dream, a nightmare" when he saw his wife bloody and lying face down in the basement laundry room of their townhouse.
 
After trying to lift his wife's body, she fell hard and Jimenez-Acosta said he went to the laundry tub and dunked his head under the tap.
 
"I wanted to wake up," he told his defence lawyer Martin Montes.
 
Jimenez-Acosta is on trial for second-degree murder after his wife's body was found badly beaten. Patricia Pacheco-Hernandez, 41, was a mother of three children.
 
When he took glass in his hand and sliced himself outside in front of a neighbour he was still trying to wake up, he told the court.
 
Assistant Crown attorney Fraser Ball challenged Jimenez-Acosta's dream-like state, saying it was instead a ploy to contaminate the crime scene to make it tough for police to investigate.
 
"No, I don't know how to do that," Jimenez-Acosta said.
 
Ball questioned why Jimenez-Acosta would remove a piece of wood from the family's back patio door.
 
Twice before, thieves had either broken into the family home or tried to while the couple's two sons were there. Their son wedged a piece of wood at the back patio door to reinforce it.
 
On the day his wife died, Jimenez-Acosta said he went to the store, looking for something the same size and shape as the wood because his wife wanted it to look nicer.
 
"Is it your bad fortune that in approximately that hour or so (you were gone) someone entered your home and brutally killed your wife?" Ball asked.
 
Ball said Jimenez-Acosta killed his wife after with a vase after she told him their marriage was over.
"That never happened," Jimenez-Acosta said.
 
Ball said Jimenez-Acosta removed the wood at the patio door and created a story about robbers,

"You used the dream-state story to cover up other details you couldn't contaminate," Ball said.
 
"It wasn't a dream, it was a nightmare," Jimenez-Acosta said.
 
Pacheco-Hernandez told him she wasn't going to pretend anymore, Ball said.
 
"No, she never said anything about getting out of the relationship," he said, adding the couple remained close to the end and even had sex the night before.
 
She smiled to him that morning, let him caress her. When he tickled her, she laughed. Someone who wanted out of a relationship wouldn't do that, he said.
 
 

Friday, April 12, 2013

Martin Montes, Associate to Calvin Barry, Defends Daniel Jimenez-Acosta




Daniel Jimenez-Acosta on trial for second-degree murder in death of wife 


By Kelly Pedro, The London Free Press

Calvin Barry and Associates- Defence Counsel on Murder trial of Daniel Jimenez-Acosta

Pathologist testifies at second-degree murder trial of Daniel Jimenez-Acosta in London 



By Jane Sims, The London Free Press

Patricia Pacheco-Hernandez’s mangled, bloodied hands told a story of terrible violence.

On her right hand, her ring finger and the tip of her thumb were almost amputated.

The ring finger of her left hand was almost cut off.

Several of her digits were fractured and twisted in unnatural ways. Her long fingernails were intact.

Photographs of her hands were shown Monday to the Superior Court jury at the trial of the woman’s husband, Daniel Jimenez-Acosta, during testimony from Edward Tweedie, the forensic pathologist who performed the autopsy on the woman’s body.

Tweedie said Pacheco-­Hernandez, 41, died from multiple blunt and sharp force head wounds on May 18, 2011, from at least 20 hits to her head.

The hand injuries were restricted to the top of the hands, an indication she put her hands onto her head attempting to ward off the blows, Tweedie said.

Jimenez-Acosta, 45, has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder.

Tweedie said there were 49 different groups of wounds. The most significant were to her head and hands.

A large group of cuts and lacerations were at the top left and back of the scalp. Parts of the skull were visible, Tweedie said, and there were more than 20 depressed fractures of the skull.

Throughout the injuries were “innumerable fragments of broken glass in the hair and head,” as well as in her hands.

More injury was found on the back of the head and near the forehead. Tweedie said it was difficult to count how many times Pacheco-Hernandez was hit in the head, but gave a conservative estimate of at least 20 times.

The wounds would cause a lot of bleeding and blood had pooled on the floor when police discovered her in the laundry room

Tweedie said there was a “marked depletion of blood left in her body” at the time of autopsy.

Though there weren’t any visible injuries to the brain, Tweedie said he couldn’t rule out a concussion that could result in unconsciousness or death.

Though there were some scattered bruises on the back of her neck, there was no internal fractures consistent with strangulation.

Tweedie was shown the broken base of a lead-glass vase. He held it and remarked on its “significant weight” and that he saw photos of glass fragments that could have come from it.

Tweedie was asked by the police to comment on photos of Jimenez-Acosta that were taken by the police at the time of his arrest.

There were scrapes on his chest and four linear marks over the breast bone. Two more scrapes showed up on his leg. Dried blood was on the back of the fingers on the right hand.

None of the wounds were in an advanced stage of healing.

The chest injuries were “consistent with fingernails” scraped across the skin and could be Pacheco-Hernandez trying to defend herself, Tweedie said.

Defence lawyer Martin Montes narrowed his focus to broken shards of glass found in a front porch planter at the couple’s southeast London townhouse and asked if they could have caused Jimenez-Acosta’s injuries.

Tweedie said it was “not entirely impossible, but unlikely.”

Forensic scientist James Currie testified that DNA found under Pacheco-Hernandez’s fingernails were a match to Jimenez-Acosta’s profile. The odds of it belonging to someone else was placed at one in 240 trillion.

Currie explained that their testing showed that another person’s DNA can only show up under nails from more intimate or forced contact. It only shows up in 60% even with a heavy scratch and can easily be washed away.

The trial takes a day off Tuesday and returns on Wednesday.

jane.sims@sunmedia.ca
http://www.lfpress.com/2013/04/08/pathologist-testifies-at-second-degree-murder-trial-of-daniel-jimenez-acosta-in-london#.UWW_rq_E-CE.email

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Calvin Barry Defends Spice Man

‘Spiceman’ trial begins in Toronto

NAVEEN POLAPADY AND LHIS LAWYER CALVIN BARRY (R) ON THE STEPS OF OLD CITY HALL IN TORONTO AFTER HIS ASSAULT TRIAL WAS DELAYED UNTIL FEB 23.


Credits: MICHAEL PEAKE/QMI AGENCY

MICHELE MANDEL | QMI AGENCY

TORONTO - Toronto restaurant owner Naveen "Spiceman" Polapady, arrested for throwing masala spice at a suspected thief, pleaded not guilty to assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm at Old City Hall court Friday morning.

His charge regarding throwing the spice at the eyes of Manuel Belo - administering a noxious substance - was dropped earlier by the Crown attorney.

His judge-alone trial opened with the playing of a 911 tape in which a winded Polapady said he was following a thief he had spotted trying to steal a computer out of a car parked in the lot behind his Bloor St. restaurant on Aug. 21, 2011.

"I caught him red handed," Polapady told the 911 operator. "I tried to put chili powder on him and he hit me."

Belo was originally charged with theft but after viewing surveillance video from the restaurant and seeing the man's injuries in the hospital - a head cut and welts on his arms and legs - the investigating detective concluded that the wrong man was under arrest.

"He was in a state of shock, he couldn't understand why this happened," testified Det.-Const. James Thompson.

"We began to view Mr. Belo as the victim in this matter and Mr. Polapady as the person responsible for his injuries."

The trial continues this afternoon.


Spice Man trial: Photos show cut and welts on man after confrontation with restaurateur

Naveen Polapady arrives at Old City Hall court in Toronto on Feb. 22. The restaurateur was charged with assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm after a confrontation with a man who he believed was trying to break into his car.
Naveen Polapady pleads not guilty to assault in physical altercation with man he believed had stolen from his car.

Colin McConnell / Toronto Star
Naveen Polapady arrives at Old City Hall court in Toronto on Feb. 22. The restaurateur was charged with assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm after a confrontation with a man who he believed was trying to break into his car.
 
By:News reporter, Published on Fri Feb 22 2013
 
A Toronto restaurateur nicknamed the “Spice Man” after throwing spice powder at a man he believed to be a thief pleaded not guilty Friday to assault charges.
 
Naveen Polapady, owner of the Bloor St. restaurant Maroli, is accused of assaulting Manuel Belo with a broomstick while confronting Belo near his car early on the morning of Aug. 21, 2011.
 
The confrontation followed a rash of break-ins and attempted break-ins to Polapady’s car and home.
“Why did you put chili powder on him?” asked the operator in a recording of a 911 call Polapady made from his car while pursuing the bicycle-riding Belo south on Palmerston Ave.
 
“He tried to hit me on my head and chest,” Polapady responded.
 
Belo was hospitalized and treated for head injuries following the incident, but was not charged.
Another man, Justin Mitchell, was later arrested for stealing Polapady’s cellphone and other electronics from his car. He pleaded guilty to theft under $5,000 last April. That theft occurred four days before Polapady’s altercation with Belo.
 
In a series of photographs presented by the Crown, Toronto police officer James Thompson identified red welts on Belo’s legs and forearms and a bloody cut on his head.
 
Based on Belo’s statement, surveillance video showing a “physical altercation” and reports from officers on the scene, Thompson said police began to view Belo as the victim rather than Polapady.
Surveillance video played in court Friday shows Polapady wielding a stick and fighting with Belo behind the restaurant. At one point Polapady appears to punch Belo in the face. Belo then leaves on his bike, followed by Polapady in his car.
 
The portion of the video showing the tussle was provided to police by Polapdy’s defence lawyer, Calvin Barry, after it was broadcast on CBC in April.
 
Polapady is charged with assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm. A previous charge of “administering a noxious substance” was dropped.
 
The “Spice Man” case has garnered much attention because of its similarities to the “Lucky Moose” case, in which Toronto store owner David Chen was arrested after catching and tying up a shoplifter.
Chen became the face of the “citizen’s arrest” legislation passed last June that empowers ordinary people to make arrests within a reasonable time of the crime being committed, when there’s no option to have police do so. It also permits people to take reasonable actions — as determined by a judge — to defend their homes and families.
 

Friday, February 1, 2013

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Left and Right: Episode 5: Our Changing Canada (Segment 1 Preview)

Published on Jan 11, 2013
On this episode, the topic of "Our Changing Canada" -- has political correctness gone too far? With guests: Calvin Barry, Defense Attorney and Jackson Doughart, Author/Blogger. Host Michael A. Charbon tackles hot button issues with polarized positions in this engaging in depth opinionated discussion series. Original Air Date: Jan. 1, 2013.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hivUAilGoGE

Left and Right: Episode 3: Immigration (Segment 1 Preview)

Published on Jan 11, 2013
On this episode, the topic of "Immigration Policy" with guests: Calvin Barry, Defense Attorney and Michael Prue, MPP Beaches-East York, NDP. Host Michael A. Charbon tackles hot button issues with polarized positions in this engaging in depth opinionated discussion series. Original Air Date: Dec. 11, 2012.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BxsR_tfqjE

Left and Right: Episode 6: The Death Penalty (Segment 1 Preview)

Published on Jan 11, 2013
On this episode, the topic of "The Death Penalty" with guests: Calvin Barry, Defense Attorney and Jackson Doughart, Author/Blogger. Host Michael A. Charbon tackles hot button issues with polarized positions in this engaging in depth opinionated discussion series. Original Air Date: Jan. 8, 2013.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dw6_SjCmGY

Calvin Barry Appears on Left and Right


Episode 4: A Changing Palestine (Segment 1 Preview) 

Published on Jan 11, 2013
On this episode, the topic of " A Changing Palestine, a region of conflict" with guests: Calvin Barry, Defense Attorney; Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice; and Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi, Secretary General of the Palestine National Initiative. Host Michael A. Charbon tackles hot button issues with polarized positions in this engaging in depth opinionated discussion series. Original Air Date: Dec. 18, 2012.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QntnDT8GzEg